|
|
|
Discussion Forums
Forum Index
> Rifles general discussion
> .375 Caliber research now live
.375 Caliber research now live
@ 03:30 pm (GMT) |
Nathan FosterHi Guys, I have finally managed to get my notes down into something readable. The final edit for the .375 family came out at 28,000 words so it was quite a mission. I have uploaded the entire family at once so that you can cross reference each of the cartridges. I hope the info serves you well.Special thanks to forum member Andrew Murray for working through the edit with me, Steph and I are immensely grateful for this thank you Andrew. https://www.ballisticstudies.com/Knowledgebase/.375+Holland++Holland+Magnum.html https://www.ballisticstudies.com/Knowledgebase/.375+Winchester.html https://www.ballisticstudies.com/Knowledgebase/.375+Weatherby+Magnum.html https://www.ballisticstudies.com/Knowledgebase/.375+Ruger.html https://www.ballisticstudies.com/Knowledgebase/.378+Weatherby+Magnum.html https://www.ballisticstudies.com/Knowledgebase/.375+Remington+Ultra+Magnum.html OK, off for a rest, completely spent. |
Replies
@ 06:05 pm (GMT) |
Gerry MoriartyRe: .375 Caliber research now liveGreat stuff. Thanks! |
@ 02:22 pm (GMT) |
Luke LahdenrantaRe: .375 Caliber research now liveThanks a lot for getting this up, I've been looking forward to reading your articles on the 375's !! |
@ 06:38 pm (GMT) |
Thomas KitchenRe: .375 Caliber research now livegreat stuff Nathan really enjoyed reading them, was also good to see few pictures to. |
@ 07:21 pm (GMT) |
Shane LlewellRe: .375 Caliber research now liveThanks so much Nathan on your Great article, I am a member of the 375 H&H Mag F/B page so I posted your web address for all on that Face book page & have already had great feedback from it, So hopefully more people world wide will check out your great Web page and bring you more customers. |
@ 03:43 am (GMT) |
Marcos GarcíaRe: .375 Caliber research now liveThank you so much Nathan, I'm eager to read it. |
|
@ 07:59 am (GMT) |
Nathan FosterRe: .375 Caliber research now liveThanks guys. These articles are never easy for me because after performing the research, I often find myself making statements that go against the flow of current (or popular) thought. The temptation is to find some middle ground of agreement to appease the 'experts' in the gun rags and so forth and avoid any negative feedback which could harm precious book sales. However, this would be a disservice to readers. Ultimately, it is better to just say what I want to say and be done with it. My hope is that if I can explain the various factors and performance in a clear manner, the reader will see things as they are, not how they are hyped up to be. Some things should be obvious. For example, you cannot take a lead sled into the field with you, therefore, sight the gun in yourself, otherwise it simply will not shoot to the same POI in the field. But when you get a bunch of folk teaching the opposite, suddenly, what should be obvious becomes abnormal. The same goes for gun design.We are getting nearer to the end of my original goal. After I have completed this first round of the knowledge base, I will need to start over and update it, though some detailed information will be left for the Cartridges book as we need some form of income. I cannot put into words what a mammoth undertaking this has been over these past (forgotten how many) years. |
Please wait
ABOUT USWe are a small, family run business, based out of Taranaki, New Zealand, who specialize in cartridge research and testing, and rifle accurizing.
|
KNOWLEDGEBASE |
KNOWLEDGEBASE |