@ 09:50 am (GMT) |
Daniel SchindlerGreetings All.Lately, Ive been considering copper bullets, specifically the 150 gr Scirocco. Barnes, Nosler, Hornady - rave reviews on E-Tips, TTSX etc. are everywhere. Experienced, I am also very aware of the downside of copper bullets that dont / wont expand under all too often, common situations like when heavy demands are placed on the bullet in tough sceanrios (300 yard+ ranges). PLUS...all the copper cleaning or what I like to call hassles. True, a lot of folks dont see the cleaning aspects that way and Ive no dispute with those folks. To each his own and the first ale is on me. I take good care of my rifles and clean accordingly. Maybe removing copper isnt the hassle I think it would be?? Anyway - for me based on my personal hunting experiences and the library of information Ive read and studied voraciously over the decades, including Nathans KB - it seems I could get it done humanely and very dependably with my rifles and an Accubond, Partition or 225 gr Gameking on everything short of DG. Which brings me here. If Im not legally required to use an all copper bullet, why would I? What am I missing here? I look forward to your comments. If I've resurrected an older post, I apologize. Thanks. Cheers. Daniel |
@ 11:34 am (GMT) |
Scott StruifRe: Using an all copper bullet?Hi Daniel. I think copper bullets are a great idea, environmentally, even though its hard to gauge what effect gut piles really have on scavengers, such as bears, condors, etc. If you read Nathans article on them, you come to realize you have to strike a balance between the harm you might cause by shooting a game animal with one at too great a distance, resulting in a wounded animal you cant track and recover, and the harm you might cause by leaving a gut pile with lead in it. I carry copper rounds for woods hunting, where their penetration is a boon, and lead rounds for longer pokes. |
@ 01:22 pm (GMT) |
Daniel SchindlerRe: Using an all copper bullet?THANKS Scott. Good to know.Cheers. |