@ 06:18 am (GMT) |
Thomas KitchenHi guys,A lot of info is hidden by the "can't comment on an on going investigation" but this is the submission of Paul from Aoraki ammunition. What he is saying is that he was able to work out when tarrant arrived in nz, by calculating when his firearm licence expired on the order form he used to buy ammo. This means within 5 weeks if arriving in nz he had a firearm licence. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxOETacDaRs |
@ 07:02 pm (GMT) |
Jon ShortRe: we all know somethings not adding up around how he got a gun licence. aoraki ammo submissionFek me!It just reinforces even more what we already knew that The Police enabled Brendan Tarrant to do what he did by failing to meet their statutory obligation to administer the Arms Act properly. I knew the Police stuffed up vetting Tarrant but this goes a whole lot further! Unbelievable that they knew exactly what the firearms were including the AR15, in writing, & exactly what ammunition & how much (shit loads) Tarrant had ordered back in 2017. It begs the question as to why the govt is looking at & the Police supporting registration of firearms, when in this situation, the Police had it in writing back in 2017 what Tarrant owned, & how much ammo he had for those weapons. Those fire arms were effectively as a result, registered with the Police. What makes us think they will take any more notice under a system of registration than they did in this instance where it was clearly recorded with them what he had? Unbelievable! Cheers Thomas, Jon |
@ 07:31 pm (GMT) |
Jon ShortRe: we all know somethings not adding up around how he got a gun licence. aoraki ammo submissionI'm sure that most members are the Police are astute & careful in carrying out their work, but not the individuals involved in this instance. |
@ 06:32 am (GMT) |
Thomas KitchenRe: we all know somethings not adding up around how he got a gun licence. aoraki ammo submissionthis guy has done a video explaining the above submission better for people that don't understandhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiRV1TAa8u8&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR12NmvxFtrMM0h_8cCFo-EQi1sKQ6Vu3REkeCdrDgmPT2MkrDZW-kigd3U Jon Short problem is that we won't get the full truth till its to late. there is more questions then answers if you hear the wording the police use. "he had no criminal record in australia" they didn't check before giving him a nz licence though even after the peter edwards case so they are pretty slow learners. also rumours that he applied in australia for a licence and got declined so if thats true nz police would of declined it here if they had checked with the australian counterparts. "the licence was legal" is another one, when you think you are the law everything you do becomes legal but doesn't mean it was right or done properly. also wonder how many mail order forms he done because he had lot more firearms then those ones. |
@ 03:44 pm (GMT) |
Warwick MarflittRe: we all know somethings not adding up around how he got a gun licence. aoraki ammo submissionMore media are picking this up. Think I'll send a link to the ABC BBC and Al jazeerahttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/117504138/mps-shut-down-public-submitter-who-says-he-supplied-bullets-to-christchurch-terror-suspect https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiRV1TAa8u8 The NZ Police need to realize that " They have Nothing to fear if they have nothing to hide" And If they're hiding stuff the public will come looking for it! Because that's how democrazy works........ Is it worth making a complaint to the "Police Complaints Authority"? |
@ 07:57 am (GMT) |
Warwick MarflittRe: we all know somethings not adding up around how he got a gun licence. aoraki ammo submissionhttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/117504138/mps-shut-down-public-submitter-who-says-he-supplied-bullets-to-christchurch-terror-suspect |